londoner_86 wrote:However, no-one is FORCING anyone to pay it.
AvonWyss wrote:londoner_86 wrote:However, no-one is FORCING anyone to pay it.
By timebombing V6 they do, in fact, take away already granted licenses for the use of V6. That is the thing that is being critisized most and called "evil"...
mb wrote:Note that the 'granted' license doesn't provide you with much of anything - in fact it has the standard disclaimer that Red Gate don't promise the software will do anything. Apparently, they're actively following through on that.
Reflector License wrote:4.1 In consideration of the mutual rights and obligations under this License, and subject to the provisions of this clause 4, the Licensor grants to the Licensee for the term of this License a limited, personal, non-exclusive, non-sub-licensable and non-transferable License:
(a) to use and copy the Software for the Licensee's own personal or internal business purposes on any computer owned, leased and/or controlled by the Licensee or its employer or organisation for whom the Licensee has installed the Software
AvonWyss wrote:There is a difference between excluding warranties and willful sabotage of the software to render it useless
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests