Feature Request: Reverse Checkboxes or Objects not selected

Compares and synchronizes SQL Server databases, backups and scripts.

Moderators: JonathanWatts, Chris Auckland, David Atkinson, eddie davis, Anu Deshpande, Michelle Taylor, alice.easey, james.billings, chengvoon.tong

Feature Request: Reverse Checkboxes or Objects not selected

Postby alecl » Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:27 pm

Often times the list of Objects NOT selected for synchronization may make a more interesting report than the objects selected.

This could either by support by having a "Reverse Selections" option of a report option for "Objects NOT selected for synchronization". The former is or even both would be preferred as that's more flexible.

Note: I am not asking about the reverse synchronization direction feature that is in there.
alecl
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:10 pm

Postby eddie davis » Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:13 am

Hi alecl

I have submitted this Feature Request, the reference number is SC-5714.

You may also wish to post your suggestion on the SQL Compare Uservoice forum using this LINK.

The reason for making this recommendation, if there are other SQL Compare users who wish to see this feature be added to the product, they can then vote for this feature. The more votes the suggestion receives, the better the chance of seeing the feature added to a future version of SQL Compare.

Thank you for your suggestion.

Many Thanks
Eddie
Last edited by eddie davis on Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Eddie Davis
Technical Support Engineer
Red Gate Software Ltd
E-mail: support@red-gate.com
eddie davis
 
Posts: 943
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Red Gate Software

Postby alecl » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:34 pm

I have added it to the user voice too. Thanks.

http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/141 ... t-selected
alecl
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:10 pm


Return to SQL Compare 10

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests